Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ICEDQ
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 04:58, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- ICEDQ (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Software platform doesn't seem to meet WP:GNG - in-depth coverage largely consists of press releases. MrsSnoozyTurtle 03:12, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete non-notable Andre🚐 03:56, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Technology, and Software. DreamRimmer (talk) 04:33, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- Delete- Nothing meets WP:ORGCRIT. Even LA Weekly is a press release reprint. --CNMall41 (talk) 05:41, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.